Just-world hypothesis
['Idea that everyone faces consequence as they deserve\n\nThe just-world fallacy , or just-world hypothesis , is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" – that actions will necessarily have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor. For example, the assumptions that noble actions will eventually be rewarded and evil actions will eventually be punished fall under this fallacy.…
Bronnen
Lees verder bij de oorsprong.
Just-world hypothesis
['Idea that everyone faces consequence as they deserve\n\nThe just-world fallacy , or just-world hypothesis , is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" – that actions will necessarily have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor. For example, the assumptions that noble actions will eventually be rewarded and evil actions will eventually be punished fall under this fallacy.…
Open de bron ↗Just-world Hypothesis
What is the Just-world Hypothesis? The just-world hypothesis (also referred to as the just-world bias , just-world fallacy, or just-world theory ) refers to our belief that the world is fair, and consequently, that the moral standings of our actions will determine our outcomes. This viewpoint causes us to believe that those who do good will be rewarded and those who exhibit dishonest behaviors will be punished.
Open de bron ↗Just-world hypothesis: betekenis & voorbeelden
Jij gelooft dat hard werk en toewijding automatisch leiden tot succes. Een geruststellende gedachte, toch? Maar wat als deze overtuiging – bekend als de ‘just-world hypothesis’ of rechtvaardige-wereldhypothese – ons begrip van zakelijk succes en falen vertroebelt? […] Read More…
Open de bron ↗Trefwoorden
Verder denken